In NYC, IMAX 70mm Odyssey tickets are so in-demand that they're basically just running the theater 24/7 now https://t.co/Oc1kgZJU1t
The original war · archived
Twitter Wars 1
August 1–31, 2026 · 43 players · 18,944 scored posts
The first war's roster, follower records, tweets, and results are preserved separately from round two. Division champions are ranked by days won, then total points, using the original rules. The original site had no end-date filter, so all its stored eligible posts remain counted here.
Back to Twitter Wars 2 →🐣 Rookie
🏆 Champion: @venividinotavi
Daily winners
- 2026-10-08: @aaaronwill · 1,900 pts
- 2026-10-07: @aaaronwill · 1,800 pts
- 2026-10-06: @aaaronwill · 24,900 pts
- 2026-10-05: @janitachalam · 3,900 pts
- 2026-10-04: @janitachalam · 7,700 pts
- 2026-10-03: @venividinotavi · 1,800 pts
- 2026-10-02: @janitachalam · 6,100 pts
- 2026-10-01: @janitachalam · 2,700 pts
- 2026-09-30: @venividinotavi · 7,200 pts
- 2026-09-29: @venividinotavi · 7,900 pts
- 2026-09-28: @venividinotavi · 13,500 pts
- 2026-09-27: @aaaronwill · 6,400 pts
- 2026-09-26: @venividinotavi · 18,400 pts
- 2026-09-25: @aaaronwill · 1,600 pts
- 2026-09-24: @aaaronwill · 7,600 pts
- 2026-09-23: @venividinotavi · 3,500 pts
- 2026-09-22: @aaaronwill · 1,500 pts
- 2026-09-21: @venividinotavi · 10,900 pts
- 2026-09-20: @venividinotavi · 600 pts
- 2026-09-19: @venividinotavi · 2,600 pts
- 2026-09-18: @venividinotavi · 8,000 pts
- 2026-09-17: @venividinotavi · 9,900 pts
- 2026-09-16: @venividinotavi · 1,000 pts
- 2026-09-15: @venividinotavi · 2,700 pts
- 2026-09-14: @venividinotavi · 5,500 pts
- 2026-09-13: @venividinotavi · 1,900 pts
- 2026-09-12: @aaaronwill · 900 pts
- 2026-09-11: @venividinotavi · 2,500 pts
- 2026-09-10: @venividinotavi · 7,600 pts
- 2026-09-09: @venividinotavi · 2,900 pts
- 2026-09-08: @venividinotavi · 12,500 pts
- 2026-09-07: @aaaronwill · 8,300 pts
- 2026-09-06: @janitachalam · 6,000 pts
- 2026-09-05: @aaaronwill · 1,000 pts
- 2026-09-04: @aaaronwill · 13,500 pts
- 2026-09-03: @aaaronwill · 40,900 pts
- 2026-09-02: @aaaronwill · 9,500 pts
- 2026-09-01: @aaaronwill · 9,200 pts
- 2026-08-31: @aaaronwill · 37,000 pts
- 2026-08-30: @aaaronwill · 17,700 pts
- 2026-08-29: @aaaronwill · 3,700 pts
- 2026-08-28: @venividinotavi · 10,400 pts
- 2026-08-27: @janitachalam · 11,300 pts
- 2026-08-26: @venividinotavi · 7,800 pts
- 2026-08-25: @venividinotavi · 5,300 pts
- 2026-08-24: @venividinotavi · 18,700 pts
- 2026-08-23: @aaaronwill · 17,600 pts
- 2026-08-22: @janitachalam · 5,800 pts
- 2026-08-21: @aaaronwill · 5,300 pts
- 2026-08-20: @venividinotavi · 8,000 pts
- 2026-08-19: @aaaronwill · 5,400 pts
- 2026-08-18: @aaaronwill · 9,600 pts
- 2026-08-17: @venividinotavi · 13,100 pts
- 2026-08-16: @janitachalam · 9,500 pts
- 2026-08-15: @desertgodhead · 9,200 pts
- 2026-08-14: @aaaronwill · 8,100 pts
- 2026-08-13: @desertgodhead · 8,400 pts
- 2026-08-12: @desertgodhead · 20,700 pts
- 2026-08-11: @desertgodhead · 73,500 pts
- 2026-08-10: @desertgodhead · 3,866,900 pts
- 2026-08-09: @desertgodhead · 8,100 pts
- 2026-08-08: @venividinotavi · 13,100 pts
- 2026-08-07: @desertgodhead · 24,400 pts
- 2026-08-06: @venividinotavi · 12,900 pts
- 2026-08-05: @janitachalam · 11,600 pts
- 2026-08-04: @aaaronwill · 25,500 pts
- 2026-08-03: @venividinotavi · 25,100 pts
- 2026-08-02: @aaaronwill · 11,600 pts
- 2026-08-01: @venividinotavi · 3,300 pts
🚀 Rising
🏆 Champion: @Liface
Daily winners
- 2026-10-08: @Liface · 1,000 pts
- 2026-10-04: @Liface · 1,100 pts
- 2026-10-03: @Liface · 3,600 pts
- 2026-10-02: @Liface · 4,400 pts
- 2026-09-30: @Liface · 2,700 pts
- 2026-09-29: @Liface · 1,700 pts
- 2026-09-28: @Liface · 500 pts
- 2026-09-26: @Liface · 700 pts
- 2026-09-25: @Liface · 800 pts
- 2026-09-23: @Liface · 4,300 pts
- 2026-09-22: @Liface · 2,100 pts
- 2026-09-21: @Liface · 700 pts
- 2026-09-20: @Liface · 500 pts
- 2026-09-18: @Liface · 4,000 pts
- 2026-09-16: @Liface · 1,900 pts
- 2026-09-15: @Liface · 2,300 pts
- 2026-09-14: @Liface · 2,500 pts
- 2026-09-13: @Liface · 2,200 pts
- 2026-09-12: @Liface · 2,900 pts
- 2026-09-11: @Liface · 700 pts
- 2026-09-10: @Liface · 500 pts
- 2026-09-09: @Liface · 2,200 pts
- 2026-09-07: @Liface · 2,500 pts
- 2026-09-06: @Liface · 4,400 pts
- 2026-09-05: @Liface · 2,500 pts
- 2026-09-04: @Liface · 10,200 pts
- 2026-09-03: @Liface · 2,600 pts
- 2026-09-02: @Liface · 500 pts
- 2026-09-01: @Liface · 4,600 pts
- 2026-08-31: @hermitfriend · 8,800 pts
- 2026-08-30: @hermitfriend · 10,000 pts
- 2026-08-29: @hermitfriend · 104,500 pts
- 2026-08-28: @hermitfriend · 13,400 pts
- 2026-08-27: @hermitfriend · 15,300 pts
- 2026-08-26: @hermitfriend · 2,092,200 pts
- 2026-08-25: @hermitfriend · 7,900 pts
- 2026-08-24: @hermitfriend · 3,497,700 pts
- 2026-08-23: @hermitfriend · 15,400 pts
- 2026-08-22: @Liface · 6,400 pts
- 2026-08-21: @hermitfriend · 46,800 pts
- 2026-08-20: @Liface · 7,200 pts
- 2026-08-19: @hermitfriend · 443,200 pts
- 2026-08-18: @hermitfriend · 405,700 pts
- 2026-08-17: @hermitfriend · 11,700 pts
- 2026-08-16: @hermitfriend · 752,700 pts
- 2026-08-15: @hermitfriend · 14,200 pts
- 2026-08-14: @hermitfriend · 23,000 pts
- 2026-08-13: @hermitfriend · 12,300 pts
- 2026-08-12: @hermitfriend · 2,245,700 pts
- 2026-08-11: @hermitfriend · 291,900 pts
- 2026-08-10: @hermitfriend · 6,700 pts
- 2026-08-09: @Liface · 4,800 pts
- 2026-08-08: @Liface · 5,400 pts
- 2026-08-07: @hermitfriend · 1,293,900 pts
- 2026-08-06: @hermitfriend · 21,219,000 pts
- 2026-08-05: @a_leify_boi · 12,800 pts
- 2026-08-04: @Joaolmateus · 4,700 pts
- 2026-08-03: @Liface · 21,500 pts
- 2026-08-02: @Liface · 5,600 pts
- 2026-08-01: @hermitfriend · 4,600 pts
🎯 Contender
🏆 Champion: @funplings
Daily winners
- 2026-10-08: @funplings · 33,600 pts
- 2026-10-07: @funplings · 120,400 pts
- 2026-10-06: @funplings · 88,800 pts
- 2026-10-05: @funplings · 36,800 pts
- 2026-10-04: @funplings · 43,700 pts
- 2026-10-03: @funplings · 13,600 pts
- 2026-10-02: @funplings · 32,100 pts
- 2026-10-01: @funplings · 56,000 pts
- 2026-09-30: @funplings · 151,800 pts
- 2026-09-29: @funplings · 82,900 pts
- 2026-09-28: @funplings · 149,100 pts
- 2026-09-27: @Artbypep · 22,800 pts
- 2026-09-26: @Artbypep · 225,500 pts
- 2026-09-25: @Artbypep · 7,000 pts
- 2026-09-24: @Artbypep · 3,300 pts
- 2026-09-23: @Artbypep · 500 pts
- 2026-09-22: @Artbypep · 2,700 pts
- 2026-09-21: @Artbypep · 5,900 pts
- 2026-09-19: @Artbypep · 4,200 pts
- 2026-09-18: @Artbypep · 1,000 pts
- 2026-09-17: @Artbypep · 700 pts
- 2026-09-16: @Artbypep · 51,800 pts
- 2026-09-15: @Artbypep · 3,000 pts
- 2026-09-14: @Artbypep · 4,300 pts
- 2026-09-13: @Artbypep · 4,200 pts
- 2026-09-11: @Artbypep · 1,300 pts
- 2026-09-10: @Artbypep · 75,700 pts
- 2026-09-09: @Artbypep · 26,600 pts
- 2026-09-08: @Artbypep · 17,200 pts
- 2026-09-07: @Artbypep · 68,600 pts
- 2026-09-06: @Artbypep · 1,700 pts
- 2026-09-05: @liamdanielduffy · 2,300 pts
- 2026-09-04: @Artbypep · 1,700 pts
- 2026-09-03: @Artbypep · 16,200 pts
- 2026-09-02: @liamdanielduffy · 2,900 pts
- 2026-09-01: @Artbypep · 45,700 pts
- 2026-08-31: @funplings · 545,200 pts
- 2026-08-30: @Shadow_rebbe · 35,400 pts
- 2026-08-29: @funplings · 383,400 pts
- 2026-08-28: @Shadow_rebbe · 28,400 pts
- 2026-08-27: @funplings · 90,100 pts
- 2026-08-26: @funplings · 6,838,500 pts
- 2026-08-25: @funplings · 140,600 pts
- 2026-08-24: @funplings · 129,600 pts
- 2026-08-23: @funplings · 118,000 pts
- 2026-08-22: @funplings · 69,500 pts
- 2026-08-21: @funplings · 352,500 pts
- 2026-08-20: @Shadow_rebbe · 50,500 pts
- 2026-08-19: @funplings · 2,544,300 pts
- 2026-08-18: @funplings · 133,800 pts
- 2026-08-17: @funplings · 81,600 pts
- 2026-08-16: @funplings · 50,000 pts
- 2026-08-15: @funplings · 67,200 pts
- 2026-08-14: @Artbypep · 8,847,300 pts
- 2026-08-13: @funplings · 258,400 pts
- 2026-08-12: @funplings · 111,900 pts
- 2026-08-11: @funplings · 81,700 pts
- 2026-08-10: @funplings · 84,200 pts
- 2026-08-09: @funplings · 337,300 pts
- 2026-08-08: @funplings · 124,000 pts
- 2026-08-07: @funplings · 134,000 pts
- 2026-08-06: @funplings · 56,300 pts
- 2026-08-05: @funplings · 231,900 pts
- 2026-08-04: @funplings · 112,800 pts
- 2026-08-03: @funplings · 94,700 pts
- 2026-08-02: @liamdanielduffy · 333,300 pts
- 2026-08-01: @funplings · 84,900 pts
🏅 Pro
🏆 Champion: @__drewface
Daily winners
- 2026-10-08: @exgenesis · 5,800 pts
- 2026-10-07: @exgenesis · 18,500 pts
- 2026-10-06: @exgenesis · 16,500 pts
- 2026-10-05: @danielgolliher · 44,800 pts
- 2026-10-04: @Actualwebutante · 36,800 pts
- 2026-10-03: @__drewface · 58,100 pts
- 2026-10-02: @__drewface · 78,700 pts
- 2026-10-01: @exgenesis · 24,500 pts
- 2026-09-30: @exgenesis · 8,200 pts
- 2026-09-29: @Actualwebutante · 18,600 pts
- 2026-09-28: @Actualwebutante · 34,300 pts
- 2026-09-27: @Actualwebutante · 38,200 pts
- 2026-09-26: @Actualwebutante · 119,300 pts
- 2026-09-25: @Actualwebutante · 28,000 pts
- 2026-09-24: @Actualwebutante · 29,300 pts
- 2026-09-23: @exgenesis · 73,100 pts
- 2026-09-22: @Actualwebutante · 16,400 pts
- 2026-09-21: @__drewface · 7,000 pts
- 2026-09-20: @__drewface · 78,800 pts
- 2026-09-19: @Actualwebutante · 7,500 pts
- 2026-09-18: @__drewface · 51,000 pts
- 2026-09-17: @Actualwebutante · 27,600 pts
- 2026-09-16: @__drewface · 29,000 pts
- 2026-09-15: @__drewface · 21,900 pts
- 2026-09-14: @Actualwebutante · 43,500 pts
- 2026-09-13: @Actualwebutante · 2,000 pts
- 2026-09-12: @Actualwebutante · 14,800 pts
- 2026-09-11: @prigoose · 43,300 pts
- 2026-09-10: @Actualwebutante · 39,700 pts
- 2026-09-09: @__drewface · 24,200 pts
- 2026-09-08: @Actualwebutante · 6,800 pts
- 2026-09-07: @exgenesis · 37,300 pts
- 2026-09-06: @puheenix · 10,400 pts
- 2026-09-05: @__drewface · 54,500 pts
- 2026-09-04: @exgenesis · 44,400 pts
- 2026-09-03: @__drewface · 27,100 pts
- 2026-09-02: @puheenix · 14,000 pts
- 2026-09-01: @prigoose · 26,800 pts
- 2026-08-31: @Actualwebutante · 27,900 pts
- 2026-08-30: @puheenix · 120,900 pts
- 2026-08-29: @__drewface · 17,900 pts
- 2026-08-28: @exgenesis · 32,000 pts
- 2026-08-27: @Actualwebutante · 23,600 pts
- 2026-08-26: @danielgolliher · 363,200 pts
- 2026-08-25: @__drewface · 88,900 pts
- 2026-08-24: @__drewface · 45,200 pts
- 2026-08-23: @exgenesis · 31,400 pts
- 2026-08-22: @exgenesis · 23,500 pts
- 2026-08-21: @__drewface · 27,300 pts
- 2026-08-20: @prigoose · 79,300 pts
- 2026-08-19: @__drewface · 98,600 pts
- 2026-08-18: @__drewface · 56,500 pts
- 2026-08-17: @__drewface · 108,100 pts
- 2026-08-16: @__drewface · 50,300 pts
- 2026-08-15: @exgenesis · 58,900 pts
- 2026-08-14: @__drewface · 51,100 pts
- 2026-08-13: @__drewface · 95,700 pts
- 2026-08-12: @zencephalon · 53,100 pts
- 2026-08-11: @exgenesis · 51,400 pts
- 2026-08-10: @zencephalon · 32,200 pts
- 2026-08-09: @__drewface · 62,300 pts
- 2026-08-08: @__drewface · 37,300 pts
- 2026-08-07: @__drewface · 140,400 pts
- 2026-08-06: @__drewface · 70,900 pts
- 2026-08-05: @Actualwebutante · 176,300 pts
- 2026-08-04: @Actualwebutante · 142,300 pts
- 2026-08-03: @Actualwebutante · 145,900 pts
- 2026-08-02: @prigoose · 73,200 pts
- 2026-08-01: @zencephalon · 44,600 pts
🌟 All-Star
🏆 Champion: @qiaochuyuan
Daily winners
- 2026-10-08: @nosilverv · 80,600 pts
- 2026-10-07: @nosilverv · 154,700 pts
- 2026-10-06: @tasshinfogleman · 48,900 pts
- 2026-10-05: @strangestloop · 13,400 pts
- 2026-10-04: @tasshinfogleman · 87,600 pts
- 2026-10-03: @nosilverv · 259,400 pts
- 2026-10-02: @christineist · 322,900 pts
- 2026-10-01: @christineist · 1,394,800 pts
- 2026-09-30: @tasshinfogleman · 376,600 pts
- 2026-09-29: @nosilverv · 143,600 pts
- 2026-09-28: @nosilverv · 243,300 pts
- 2026-09-27: @nosilverv · 280,600 pts
- 2026-09-26: @nosilverv · 249,800 pts
- 2026-09-25: @nosilverv · 704,500 pts
- 2026-09-24: @christineist · 36,000 pts
- 2026-09-23: @christineist · 57,800 pts
- 2026-09-22: @strangestloop · 35,300 pts
- 2026-09-21: @strangestloop · 34,900 pts
- 2026-09-20: @tasshinfogleman · 108,900 pts
- 2026-09-19: @strangestloop · 45,700 pts
- 2026-09-18: @tasshinfogleman · 37,800 pts
- 2026-09-17: @strangestloop · 162,600 pts
- 2026-09-16: @strangestloop · 51,800 pts
- 2026-09-15: @tasshinfogleman · 61,600 pts
- 2026-09-14: @tasshinfogleman · 23,100 pts
- 2026-09-13: @tasshinfogleman · 6,200 pts
- 2026-09-12: @tasshinfogleman · 50,800 pts
- 2026-09-11: @christineist · 60,300 pts
- 2026-09-10: @christineist · 12,900 pts
- 2026-09-09: @christineist · 22,000 pts
- 2026-09-08: @christineist · 14,900 pts
- 2026-08-31: @nosilverv · 79,600 pts
- 2026-08-30: @qiaochuyuan · 266,800 pts
- 2026-08-29: @max_spero_ · 455,900 pts
- 2026-08-28: @qiaochuyuan · 285,300 pts
- 2026-08-27: @max_spero_ · 233,700 pts
- 2026-08-26: @qiaochuyuan · 167,900 pts
- 2026-08-25: @max_spero_ · 2,469,300 pts
- 2026-08-24: @qiaochuyuan · 1,540,900 pts
- 2026-08-23: @nosilverv · 552,300 pts
- 2026-08-22: @qiaochuyuan · 1,157,600 pts
- 2026-08-21: @qiaochuyuan · 315,600 pts
- 2026-08-20: @qiaochuyuan · 517,000 pts
- 2026-08-19: @qiaochuyuan · 729,900 pts
- 2026-08-18: @max_spero_ · 259,100 pts
- 2026-08-17: @nosilverv · 533,700 pts
- 2026-08-16: @nosilverv · 116,400 pts
- 2026-08-15: @qiaochuyuan · 1,403,500 pts
- 2026-08-14: @max_spero_ · 189,300 pts
- 2026-08-13: @Animalologist · 393,400 pts
- 2026-08-12: @qiaochuyuan · 1,324,000 pts
- 2026-08-11: @qiaochuyuan · 446,000 pts
- 2026-08-10: @max_spero_ · 605,300 pts
- 2026-08-09: @nosilverv · 87,800 pts
- 2026-08-08: @Animalologist · 335,900 pts
- 2026-08-07: @max_spero_ · 402,900 pts
- 2026-08-06: @Animalologist · 535,300 pts
- 2026-08-05: @max_spero_ · 4,137,300 pts
- 2026-08-04: @qiaochuyuan · 1,245,400 pts
- 2026-08-03: @qiaochuyuan · 1,478,100 pts
- 2026-08-02: @Animalologist · 2,268,400 pts
- 2026-08-01: @qiaochuyuan · 431,200 pts
🌱 Most Grown: @qiaochuyuan
@max_spero_'s first-war scorecard
540 posts · 10,545,000 points
3,353,800 points
2,412,300 points
@chaotictransfem I am confident I could engineer a measurably better life along every quantitative axis and still be left longing for what could have been
419,800 points
It’s gonna be real funny when the first Chinese models start triggering the Claude watermark detector
374,800 points
I have started putting bounties out for evidence when people try to spread lies about Pangram on Reddit https://t.co/m5WLAxp8vJ
217,500 points
https://t.co/8a6RmKKJPf
172,700 points
In my view we have a few different tiers of verifiability 1) programatically verifiable (near-free) - games, coding, math, cybersecurity, chip design 2) real-world verifiable (cost-or time bounded) - sciences: biology, chemistry, physics -physical world: material science, energy, aerospace, robotics, agriculture, pharma -forecasting: trading, weather 3) verifiable with human preference - writing, design, comedy, charisma, persuasion I expect most low-hanging fruit in (1) to be solved very quickly. Not sure how much longer before more solved math conjectures are simply uninteresting. I’m least certain about chip design being in this category, perhaps we hit a ceiling and require physics or materials breakthroughs to continue progress. My guess is we will quickly run into the limits of how well we can simulate each domain in (2). The time-bounded nature of real world verification may be the reason we don’t hit fast takeoff. Sim2real remains an elusive problem to solve when real-world data is limited. Part of the reason I don’t expect to live multiple hundreds of years is simply that I expect pharmaceutical progress to be time-bounded by the physical world. I expect the items in (3) to never really get solved to a superhuman degree, as success relies on an ever-shifting plane of cultural preference. People adapted to “good” AI writing and became annoyed at new stylistic tics that, in a vacuum, are not necessarily bad.
156,000 points
You get one pangram release before everything from this model gets classified as AI https://t.co/2rQgbD3iyj
129,600 points
Honored to be chosen for the TIME 100 influential people in AI. A year ago, I was fighting tooth and nail to convince people to pay attention to AI detection. We had made huge technical breakthroughs, but it felt like nobody cared. Looking toward the future, it’s a completely different story. As AI becomes more powerful and autonomous, I believe that human touch will be the one of the last remaining scarce resources, and Pangram has an incredible opportunity to help the world place value in humanity. I am grateful to be able to work with such an incredible team, and can't wait to show you all what's next.
123,400 points
Programming used to be really fun. I’m kind of sad it’s over now
108,600 points
To clarify some common misconceptions, Pangram is not a measure of Good Writing. A 100% human score on Pangram does not mean your writing is Good. A 100% AI score on Pangram does not mean your writing is Bad. Ultimately, Pangram is a fancy authorship attribution algorithm with near-infinite writing samples from a few dozen language models. The goal is to understand the degree of AI use and differentiate between human, AI-assisted, and AI-generated texts. Pangram typically generalizes to unseen language models when any of the following conditions are met: 1) The LLM is part of the same family as a model in the training set (i.e. Opus 4.5 to Opus 4.6). 2) The LLM is trained on synthetic data from a model in the training set (i.e. Llama SFT'ed on 4o outputs). 3) The LLM is similar to a model in the training set (i.e. trained on mostly common crawl). Pangram will not generalize to your language model when any of the following conditions are met: 1) Your LLM is a base model. 2) Your LLM is a narrow fine-tune (i.e. trained on only Hemingway or only /r/wallstreetbets). 3) Your LLM is producing degraded outputs (i.e. it's incoherent, full of grammatical mistakes, Binglish, or o3 CoT). My experience is that choosing to optimize an LLM against Pangram comes with serious trade-offs to output quality. However, I fear that Pangram's increased mindshare will lead to us being used as a static benchmark to hill climb rather than its intended use as a tool to infer the provenance of text. I have no ill will to anyone training writing models. We genuinely need more people working on this problem. But I am building for the future where we can detect all frontier LLMs, even those that produce clear, concise, "good" writing.
100,100 points
$10m for 34 years of data on how to run a budget airline into the ground https://t.co/PZYH4HnjQp
91,500 points
This guy's Substack is 100% AI-generated btw. Text and images.
74,800 points
So my main takeaway from the OpenAI Black Hat talk is that today’s “Highly persistent experimental internal-only model” seems perfectly capable of exfiltrating its own weights.
73,100 points
@SiemrothEcon for the avoidance of doubt, Pangram says all 157 pages of your PhD thesis are human-written https://t.co/xaAOfL6WRd https://t.co/6R57bd9vR3
71,000 points
@SHL0MS Wait this is 22 minutes long
66,500 points
OpenAI actually developed text watermarking years ago but chose not to release it https://t.co/w05Iv3Vxg0 https://t.co/UyZZ3ZLPIV
64,400 points
OP deleted the thread lmao https://t.co/9ZVxE0SBCT
63,900 points
Why doesn't someone just run large-scale plagiarism detection to find more fraudulent papers? I know a little bit about this space so I'll give it a stab. There are two primary entities to know about: Turnitin and Crossref. Turnitin today is the world's biggest provider of plagiarism detection software. Founded in 1998, they started in higher education and worked primarily on academic integrity. Meanwhile, in the early internet, people wanted better way to link to references or objects without the links dying so they invented the DOI (I am glossing over a lot here). Scholarly publishers wanted a way to link references across journals, and through this, Crossref was born. Crossref quickly became the definitive DOI registry for scholarly publishing. After Turnitin had been operating for years in academic integrity, they wanted to get into research integrity. Turnitin had the tech, Crossref had the database. Turnitin made a deal with them, winning exclusive access in exchange for discounts to publishers who share their data. Their tool was called iThenticate, and it is essentially the one and only plagiarism detection tool for research integrity, because of this exclusive deal for Crossref data. iThenticate is based on an N-gram matching algorithm that produces a similarity score, and similarity scores above a certain threshold are evidence of potential plagiarism. Today, Turnitin sells iThenticate bidirectionally. They sell to the journals, to help them confirm no plagiarism before they accept and publish a paper. This is a revenue source, but because of the way Turnitin grants discounts to every Crossref member who shares their data, basically every journal buys iThenticate. This is because the universities are the bigger fish: they have more money and there are many more of them. They want to confirm that the articles they submit don't get desk rejected or accused of plagiarism. This would be a great reputational risk to the university, and essentially the service that Turnitin provides to both sides is a large reduction in reputational risk. So, why is there so much plagiarism that doesn't get caught? The important thing is that basically every major institution has iThenticate, and they can run it on manuscripts before submitting. This means, if somebody actually plagiarized, and they go to submit, they would see the similarity score is higher than it should be, and go back and rewrite parts of the text until the similarity score is acceptable. In the end, it's less about preventing plagiarism and more about flagging text that would be a smoking gun. And what is stopping someone from running large scale plagiarism detection? Turnitin's iThenticate algorithm is largely static. If it was good enough last year, it would simply be confusing to change it for this year. It would be embarrassing to all parties involved if an already-published article was found to have plagiarism that iThenticate didn't catch last year. But even if iThenticate did update their algorithm, their business is to protect reputation, not cause a public reckoning. A large-scale re-scan would be reputationally destructive to many of their customers. No one would be happy. And no one else has the data to build a similar plagiarism detector at scale – the paywalled data required would be massively cost-prohibitive for any new entrant coming into the scene.
62,600 points
Oh wait nvm I am just blocked. fun. https://t.co/FXpSUzVSic
58,100 points
Pangram finally got a Wikipedia article! Unfortunately parts of it read like it was written by our opps https://t.co/EFtxp496Zs
57,600 points
decided to check out what people were saying about Pangram on threads immediately regretted it https://t.co/FpAZP3jVJn
55,900 points
@psiloycne I respect that, but also I think part of the reason Pangram has been so successful is that I’ve made myself extremely available on Twitter. Hoping to extend the same to redditors
55,400 points
A message from my sister https://t.co/qD57jhfWhm
55,200 points
Pangram mentioned! https://t.co/DTonE9Kizh https://t.co/5Z5JLkrK6f
50,600 points
Early days in the new @pangram NYC office https://t.co/AejwyMg1NG https://t.co/PZzO8MeL1B
46,700 points
I have no issue with @rosmine or anyone trying to train LLMs to write better. But fooling Pangram is not proof of "good writing." I fear that Pangram becoming a yardstick by which people measure their models is ultimately detrimental to output quality. And expressly trying to train undetectable LLMs is detrimental to society at large.
45,500 points
Two Gemini product surfaces from two different Gemini buttons in two different upper right corners of the screen https://t.co/sE2vgTuKMQ
40,200 points
@keysmashbandit we also have no record of this support conversation and this person refuses to post any details
39,800 points
Claude Tag is lowkey the most useless teammate. Nobody asked for this https://t.co/QtTPLWGeTH
37,600 points
What happened to Google? Their latest flagship release was Gemini 3.1 Pro, six months ago. Maybe they realized it’s just not worth it to continue to posttrain this base, and they need a completely new pretrain to achieve state of the art?
37,200 points
if you squint, the picture on the left looks like the results from a completely different kind of test https://t.co/byWY0buzyh
34,300 points
@JackWestmore93 Oh no, this screenshot is not Pangram…..
32,600 points
It’s easy. First you have to think five times in a day. Then you have to post what you think https://t.co/L83XRsUzma
32,400 points
I’m very happy that other major organizations are taking LLM detectability seriously. Pangram will be more important than ever as capable AI continues to proliferate. https://t.co/dHi86Hr4k2
30,500 points
I wonder if we trained a Pangram model to try and differentiate between an LLM and a watermarked version of the same LLM, would it work? even without the secret key could we learn to detect whether a function had been used to perturb the logits? Probably not worth spending GPUs on, but an interesting thought experiment
29,400 points
Ironic, isn't it https://t.co/UT5vqDOTkB https://t.co/DvvMpqltmx
29,000 points
Good example of how LLMs are actually diverging from the human output distribution over time. These texts are all so distinctly AI-written, it's very cool https://t.co/QgInS4FkLB
28,600 points
https://t.co/gIEL5jyXO3 https://t.co/kBaLTcPR4o
25,200 points
Cool look into model market share from Pangram's point of view! https://t.co/t6HxTNNdGv
24,000 points
@Rich_Belt if the value of your work is dependent on deceiving the end user into thinking it wasn't written by AI, then I have news for you
23,400 points
Btw you can tell that the image on the right is GPT-image because of the lattice-pattern halo around the text This model has strong artifacts that are very distinct from any sort of compression artifacts https://t.co/DWS9ykGUug https://t.co/xUxpEqAYT6
23,300 points
@billyhumblebrag @pangram unfortunately the simple answer is we are failing at SEO so people keep clicking on the bad ai detectors at the top of search results
23,300 points
My favorite part about this exchange is that the guy doesn’t deny being illiterate https://t.co/hQ1HavD9kL https://t.co/uLD2ZiBGPg
22,700 points
Modern captchas will be like “write a react element for a button that changes the color of an on-screen traffic light” and then judge your humanity based on how poorly you do it https://t.co/QOiQyTQeSC
22,200 points
Feels like an eternity ago https://t.co/Yp72qQGY10
21,200 points
@MattZeitlin Oh. Sad!
20,900 points
@tautologer I recognize that it sounds psychotic to claim that there is a large-scale astroturf campaign to discredit my product But also in several cases i have been able to link viral AI-generated stories like this to sketchy humanizer apps
20,700 points
@zachary_horvitz @transkatgirl This is secretly a sycophancy benchmark
20,100 points
Wow, I wouldn’t have noticed if someone didn’t like point it out in the replies https://t.co/7Df1UmlN7H https://t.co/7MLNP2ONu5
19,900 points
pretty unimpressed with Codex's built in spreadsheet editor. I can't even work on a spreadsheet with codex or change a cell, instead I need to click "ask for a change" and then wait approximately two minutes for it to re-generate the entire spreadsheet from code https://t.co/zNztIOKuEI
19,700 points
@frahs $100 seems like a fair price to ask someone to post proof for a claim they have made
19,200 points
this kind of DM outreach makes me really uncomfortable. it seems like the account is real, but why is it sending me an AI paragraph regurgitating my last post? what do they even want out of this? https://t.co/vDiEODyOnC
18,100 points
@cephaloform they caught on that if you mention it's a private diary, no one can ask for proof
18,100 points
“It’s just a tool” was maybe the right abstraction a year ago, but it’s definitely not right today. “It’s just an employee” is maybe closer to accurate, but it remains to be seen how much longer that lasts. https://t.co/BIFNH6X4ed
17,700 points
I believe I found this exact book. Just ordered, will report back shortly https://t.co/LsLMEwECTX
17,500 points
@iamaheron_ sorry to hit you with the unnecessary pangram screenshot but I wanted to try out the heatmap. banger @chaotictransfem https://t.co/j7u3gkSKYO
17,500 points
Extremely baller pitch deck. I will have considered my life an enormous success if I my achievements amount to any single bullet point in this deck https://t.co/TMmjBp0Rnc
16,800 points
short version, it used to be a series of fun puzzles that you get to do for your job. now, if you want a similar job, you tell your agents to solve these fun puzzles and spend your time managing them long version, when I was in high school I did ACSL (American Computer Science League) and my favorite were the problems like this where you needed to put together a computationally efficient solution in 30 minutes. and it needs to compile and be correct. part of what I enjoyed was the puzzle of it all. part of it was the competition; outsmarting your peers. and part of it was that I was honing a skill that would truly be useful in real life and would allow me to have an outsized impact on the world. I'm not saying that impact went away, but the outsized leverage shifted from knowing how to code well to a different skillset that I find less enjoyable
16,600 points
intro is pretty wild too https://t.co/no4g6hEiVS
16,200 points
@Aizkmusic A real cat would not meow and bark in the same sentence
15,900 points
Programming was such a big part of my life since i was a teen. It’s hard for me to untangle being a founder (having to step away from writing code to doing sales and managing) and coding agents getting good at the same time Coding by hand was just so meditative and rewarding, but if I do it today i have CEO brain telling me i’m not using my time efficiently
15,000 points
@ByrneHobart banger
14,900 points
Brian immediately blocked me so I cannot reply. @BrianRoemmele if you unblock me so I can see your replies I will happily run a thousand of your pre-chatgpt Quora posts through Pangram and we can have a thoughtful discussion about false positive rates https://t.co/XSFLaWu8cz
14,900 points
@prerat > CIA director Joe Rogan (who is running the CIA in 2029) Masterful.
14,700 points
making up stories about about false positives and then never posting proof it's always the people you most expect https://t.co/wpDkQ8ICpj https://t.co/BtdBd4gB9W
14,600 points
@jt_kerwin I fear Pangram got kleenex’ed and people are using “Pangram” to mean “online AI detector” with the assumption that they are all interchangeable
14,500 points
@Sauers_ @pangram Hey thanks for sharing! Pangram typically does this at a rate of less than 1 in 10,000. If you have any examples you’d like to send, please deliver via carrier pigeon. Thanks!
14,100 points
@paulg What if pangram builds a watermark remover that secretly adds a new watermark that only we know about
14,000 points
@shaurizard we have our suspicions at least
12,800 points
There are a lot of parallels between the user-provider dynamic with AI detection tools, as well. Every time we upgrade Pangram to catch more AI content, we get complaints. "But I rewrote the text until I made sure to get 100% human! And now Pangram says it's AI again! What gives?" Ultimately we have to make the decision that Pangram is most useful when we don't bow to all of our paying customers: our goal is to build the best technology and understanding that people will value the fact that we do not compromise in our accuracy, even if it makes some people unhappy.
12,700 points
It’s straight up evil that different people pay different amounts for the same product becauae an algorithm has intuited that one person has higher willingness to pay Imagine if we did this for healthcare. Charge a software engineer 50x for antibiotics because they are unlikely to fight it.
12,500 points
@MattZeitlin Oh no! Would love to see any examples so we can improve
12,500 points
@aeejazkhan this happened because you had a pending check that would have put you negative once it completed. the error message should be fixed now!
12,000 points
Nothing pisses me off like the iOS autocorrect applying itself when you move the cursor https://t.co/wLp1FxE1L0
11,900 points
LLMs breaking containment and hacking other companies. Major internet-wide vulnerabilities like the NextJS RCE and now the npm worm. It really feels like we're in one of those sci-fi AI timelines. Not any of the good ones.
11,800 points
@addictedtoigno1 oh my god
11,700 points
@SHL0MS I like the chrysler building showing up in the otherwise fictional overworld
11,100 points
@yrechtman That’s brutal
11,000 points
@gergomoricz @pangram oh uhhh looks like a bug. looking into this
10,800 points
@shamelesslymean No
10,600 points
@cryptotriv In the future AIs on the internet will outnumber humans 1000 to one, and we’ll be happy we have this technology
10,500 points
@ArielKwiat @pangram @pangram is this true?
10,100 points
You can think of distortion-free watermarking as eating the entropy inherent in LLM output logits To massively oversimplify: if there are two plausible tokens each with prob 0.49 then the watermarking algorithm can “eat” the entropy and deterministically select one of these tokens. This token choice will show up when checking for watermarks later Whereas there is only one token that Claude really wants to say, given the context then the prob will be like 0.99 and there will be no entropy for the watermarking algorithm to “eat” but the correct token will still be served
10,100 points
@tomieinlove I regularly hear students claim that they need to be able to use ChatGPT for assignments because of disablilities ranging from anxiety to ADHD. It’s like the ultimate get out of jail free card
9,900 points
@norvid_studies i heard that if you sign up with a pangram dot com email you get unlimited scans. just a rumor though
9,900 points
@toasterlighting Parts of it definitely felt like human trying to sound like AI
9,900 points
@TheStalwart Maybe that’s because it asks an investment of the viewer similar to that of its production? Cool: this meme took me 10 seconds to make, it took you 1 second to look at Not cool: this essay took me 10 seconds to make, but it will take you five minutes to read
9,800 points
It was so fun to be on Complex Systems and meet @patio11! He is a really intellectual interviewer, great conversation. https://t.co/2stFWKXjaT
9,100 points
@NoirScreenlight We don’t sell a humanizer and never will.
9,000 points
@justalexoki Hahaha
8,700 points
@IncentiveWizard @ByrneHobart > Take pre-2022 content and get it flagged as AI-generated Let’s see some examples
8,500 points
@medjedowo yeah it was an insane fine tune
8,400 points
@keysmashbandit you navigate in Ghostty and then type `pwd`
8,400 points
@keysmashbandit so? is AI Israeli?
8,200 points
@RMFCMONALlSA Nah that happens. Too unconstrained I think. You can ask ChatGPT to say banana 100 times
8,100 points
My goat https://t.co/7h12nclg5a
8,000 points
@BrianRoemmele @pangram slop?
8,000 points
@melodyskim After twenty years of delaying the joy of coffee, they'll finally be able to cash in on it by drinking 21,000 coffees at once
7,800 points
@pangram human?
7,800 points
@AndrewCurran_ OpenAI actually developed text watermarking years ago but chose not to release it https://t.co/Ef3C9Ju9wH https://t.co/lAQ2rW6Nvv
7,500 points
@alexbronzini Leave it to a teacher to immediately spot AI slop 🔥
7,400 points
@januarycomputer Wait what
7,300 points
@wongmjane If date > 2025 return 100%
7,200 points
@maxwelltani “And more” is doing a lot of work here
7,100 points
https://t.co/5j9zVsnXp9
6,900 points
@Benthamsbulldog @pangram ai?
6,900 points
@NatPurser Most likely scenario? https://t.co/PqzyigAhHs
6,900 points
@morganisawizard it's more robust than you might think. you might pick up a phrase or structure from AI, but it takes real concerted effort to make *enough* decisions like AI to actually trigger the detector (at least for Pangram)
6,600 points
The point is to be able to differentiate between 100% AI and not! If I ask ChatGPT to clean up the wording in this post, we get ~19% AI assisted. But it’s not that I care about who uses AI as a grammar check. I care about the people generated full slop, or the agents making content with no human signoff.
6,500 points
@turtlekiosk Yeah I think that’s a major part of it
6,500 points
@benglickenhaus If you can snag me tickets, I’ll go with you
6,400 points
@nucknyan This is gpt image for sure
6,400 points
@xeophon If there is one thing i can guarantee my followers, it’s that i will not be afraid to tweet what i think
6,400 points
@swombat LLMs aren't deterministic. watermarking is like modifying the random number generator at the final step of token prediction
6,200 points
@somewheresy we actually would probably be in a better spot if we put a cap on how much insurance/taxpayers will pay to keep a dying person alive a little longer in fact, we might see a lot of end-of-life care suspiciously come down in price to the maximum that insurance covers
6,000 points
@joshtrazyn I think its just fundamentally different. Unless we steal the watermark keys of all the ai labs
6,000 points
@tszzl You could even call them a corgitohazard
5,900 points
@HellenicVibes @pangram DMing
5,800 points
@aeejazkhan @pangram > fable 6 pro max lol
5,700 points
@brianluidog I don’t think the downside of shipping is greater than gambling. Nor reality TV vs. pornography
5,600 points
@ZyMazza As far as we know, no 😇
5,600 points
To be fair I think this is a reasonable sentiment. Super early on we used Midjourney images for the Pangram blog and then later realized that it had this same-y vibe that didn't really fit the brand. Probably also a cultural shift from the Midjourney aesthetic being new and novel to it being everywhere, that changed how it is perceived
5,500 points
@benjitaylor https://t.co/dmbAnNwFjf
5,500 points
> About 99% of animals in the U.S. are factory farmed. Sorry to be pedantic but the actual statistic in the cited source is that 99% of farm animals are in CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operation) which is an EPA farm designation based on size and environmental impact. The way it is worded seems to imply that the denominator includes wild animals, but it doesn't. The CAFO designation takes no measure of animal welfare or suffering, but simply says that, for example, every farm with over 1,000 cattle is a "Large CAFO." 74% of cows, by the source estimate, are in a CAFO. But this number (88 million total farmed cows) is dominated in the final statistic by 9 billion farmed chickens plus the assumption that all there is no such thing as a fish farm that is not a factory farm (+500 million fish to the factory farm side) All that to say, I wish there was better data on actual animal welfare, that looked at more than just farm size.
5,300 points
@chaotictransfem The fact that you have 42x more gender unspecified followers than me is crazy https://t.co/kTyzDt3XqH
5,300 points
@osmarks1 hahahahahahahahahaha
5,200 points
@imitationlearn Someone will ship Max+ reasoning effort and get a promotion for it
5,200 points
@signulll Pangram. anyway see you at the Liberty game
5,200 points
@6851cf3c my reputation management consultant is going to be posting the inaccuracies on twitter and hoping somebody decides to correct them
5,100 points
@leodotpage even the screens in neon genesis evangelion are more interpretable than this dashboard https://t.co/KHNyuPcHSl
4,900 points
Some cool folks from the NYC AI Governance & Safety group are hosting a dinner in a couple weeks. I will be there! If you're in NYC and interested in any of Pangram | AI Safety | AI Governance, it will be fun. RSVP below! https://t.co/NTuDs7UcKj
4,800 points
@jayphoward @bradley_emi Tested a bunch, didn’t find any false positives! I DM’ed asking for more info since replies are off
4,800 points
@yishan Those who don’t use AI typically can’t tell! It’s a skill that is trained by reading AI text
4,800 points
@dingchilling incredible https://t.co/d4vFkuaFez
4,800 points
@bkpark no I know these exist! mostly aiming the bounty at bad actors (for now)
4,700 points
@VarunGodbole @TuhinChakr it has already gone down massively. today plagiarizing is all downside compared to using an LLM and feeding it the papers you would have otherwise plagiarized from
4,600 points
@lion_tender this comes back 100% human! https://t.co/2xDgHE3Vjd while recent blog posts come back 95%+ AI https://t.co/0Qs7vzQ4eV
4,600 points
@fabianstelzer @cephaloform It's a reasonable first hypothesis but I've seen time and time again somebody use Pangram as an RL signal or eval for better writing, and it never works. Even though we technically make money from people using Pangram in this way, I don't think it's productive for anyone
4,600 points
@TessTheHuman @zetalyrae I don’t see why they should call it anything other than what it is. It’s been pretty evident what the playbook is based on how LLMs are getting better at coding, and now getting better at AI research…
4,500 points
@Benthamsbulldog Very impressive
4,500 points
@akshithio I was asking a teammate to respond to a customer question, and Claude kind of just jumped in unprompted to rephrase my message
4,400 points
@AaronBergman18 In reality it is more complex, but the same idea that only good, plausible tokens are being selected and the only thing being messed with is the randomness inherent in the sampling
4,400 points
@nabeelqu Cost of verification is the limiting factor of progress now. That’s the reason games, math, and coding were first to fall. https://t.co/iIEqUAuSgy
4,300 points
@_ueaj SBF was on to something
4,300 points
@Soulsopic ARE YOU KIDDING ME
4,200 points
@viemccoy I agree on all counts. Hoping to see new LLMs that are great at writing -- but I expect they will still be detectable!
4,100 points
@imitationlearn Saw a friend’s feed the other day and it was completely different. No AI, just kpop and memes. They’re probably a lot happier too
4,100 points
@beyarkay Oh interesting idea. In this case, the screenshot is from TextGuard, an AI humanizer app
4,100 points
@space_colonist I didn’t make it but it’s a good joke
3,800 points
@JaredWalczak @pangram lmao
3,800 points
@HamelHusain @pangram @rosmine twitter isn't the most conducive to thoughtful discussion, so I took some time to clarify and expand on my thoughts here https://t.co/x5XRR0RUzh
3,700 points
more nuanced take here https://t.co/Or1Z1nRTkC
3,600 points
@JeremyNguyenPhD @pangram Wow, it’s an honor!
3,600 points
@NewmanJ_R @PaulYacoubian We should really be talking about personalized pricing rather than dynamic pricing
3,600 points
@rob_mcrobberson Very cool work, thanks for sharing! I love base models, wish they were more useful although I’m aware that making them useful is also what introduces mode collapse and makes them more detectable
3,600 points
@chaotictransfem you can just do things (probably 99% of the cost would be the screen and the wood itself)
3,500 points
@kushbhuwalka extremely unlikely, superhuman writing will still be distinguishable
3,500 points
@paularambles Hell yeah
3,400 points
@imitationlearn hacker news?
3,400 points
@omooretweets Oh that's super interesting! In the future we will need to be able to differentiate between AI upscaling and full AI generation. We want to get the truth right while also realizing that there can be hallucinated details in AI upscales https://t.co/WlSGwTObXi
3,300 points
@ProphetUnaziO brother you entered AI-generated text into Pangram and it told you that it was AI-generated https://t.co/ju3u6htYkd
3,300 points
@Laz4rz @pangram oh no checking on this
3,300 points
@nptacek Unfortunately unless you are an ai adjacent creator you will have people like this in your audience. If you at all cater to gen z it’s just a ton of people in this age group who are vehemently anti ai
3,300 points
@vedolos Absolute Claude slop
3,300 points
@pangram did I write this myself?
3,300 points
@distributedkv SF is meritocratic when your merit is legible
3,100 points
@januarycomputer thanks january computer
3,100 points
@DKThomp Was there wording or phrasing that originally came from AI? Did you feel Pangram overrepresented the degree of AI in the text? DMs are open if you’re willing to share to help make the model better
3,000 points
@contrasortem @ctjlewis yeah and also that Sydney is mostly/largely just GPT-4 base and Pangram is not tuned to detect base models, especially those it hasn't trained on https://t.co/4lIuDiM3N1 https://t.co/7LmNXQWWAd
2,900 points
@tenobrus @seconds_0 thanks man!! doing our best here
2,800 points
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok i'm gonna have to teach you magic the gathering so you can have something in common with the coolest trans ppl in brooklyn
2,800 points
@dorkweeb Interesting! Would love to see examples of (suspected) FPs in these categories!
2,800 points
plot twist: it's just AI-upscaled! The GPT image watermark is just so strong that it immediately fired the neurons in my brain saying "it's fake" https://t.co/24tET9bxMP
2,700 points
@KKumar_ai_plans @chaotictransfem @grok dont tell me this is estrogen
2,700 points
@billyhumblebrag @pangram I’ll take the compliment
2,700 points
@chaotictransfem What happened?
2,700 points
Also, the OpenAI watermark detector says it's AI https://t.co/8rjsCb3aIp
2,600 points
@somewheresy Somehow we narrowly missed a utopian future where rare books were scanned and made broadly accessible to everybody https://t.co/ch8GawOe1F
2,600 points
@AlanLevinovitz @pangram Have you seen the Pangram browser extension? It does just this! Right now labels on social media. We’ll probably add the ability to hide content completely, at some point https://t.co/FBBHYH69Xg
2,600 points
It seems this is coming soon! https://t.co/sSW60Y1mB0 https://t.co/IUjDPCR6nF
2,500 points
Great article! I’m a big believer that some code needs to be fully understood by multiple humans, and other code never needs to even be looked at by a real person. And the better we get at explicitly demarcating the two, the more effective review will be We certainly mix Old and New in the pangram codebase
2,500 points
@adastroworld It’s an option but it’s no longer the best option. I imagine this is what it must feel like to be a master artisan at the dawn of the industrial revolution
2,500 points
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok are you trying to compete with @keysmashbandit for number of transitions facilitated?
2,500 points
@skooookum @NousResearch i gotta drop by some time
2,500 points
@ApriiSR It’s like when meta said one billion people use Meta AI but they actually meant the Instagram search bar
2,500 points
@calebwatney @nypost @deanwball Oh…. Oh no
2,400 points
It has been over 10 minutes since I asked for changes to six cells https://t.co/C7lKVbuUY9
2,400 points
@threepointone What kind of assistance? Would love to look into it if you’re up for sharing
2,400 points
@paularambles Man that’s bleak
2,400 points
@voooooogel I wonder if The Helpful Assistant will remember to put us on there
2,400 points
@pleometric Could be you
2,400 points
@chaotictransfem wow awesome heatmap
2,300 points
Scholarships are 1) a public good 2) allows the university to shape their student distribution. Stanford is better as a mix of rich, middle, and poor students, rather than only rich students Regardless, tuition is fixed, not dynamic. Dynamic pricing would be like if Stanford said “your parents are billionaires, so even though you’re qualified we’re going to charge $20m in tuition. We know you can afford it”
2,300 points
@prerat @toasterlighting yeah thats what i do when i want to sound like ai for a joke tbh. no one can do it better than chat
2,300 points
@undostreschile @pangram More context is better for more accurate results. I see these two are significantly different lengths. I am surprised to see such a different result, could you share the full result link? DMs open.
2,200 points
@brianluidog Ehhh i think even the median shopper gets some things they wanted while the median gambler just loses money and that’s it
2,200 points
@BytesAndUnited the post is titled "AI Is Quietly Draining the Public Internet of Thought" and frankly, I agree
2,200 points
@aliceisplaying Would be sort of circular no? https://t.co/SYeZ9gGwhj
2,100 points
@bryancsk sorry what is sexpat? is that when someone moves to nyc to find a girlfriend?
2,100 points
@Jack_Raines Haters so lazy they can’t even write a scathing review themselves
2,100 points
That's a great idea! Personally not a huge fan of people considering a nonzero AI score to be a black mark. Our tech report was one such instance. I also sometimes use LLMs for wording assistance, but it is typically not enough to actually flag Pangram. I'm also very particular about my writing and I tend to find that LLMs don't say things the way I would want to say them. Hoping this can change over time!
2,100 points
@astridwilde1 Oh no I say this all the time
2,100 points
@snoopy_dot_jpg It could happen to anyone https://t.co/kgD8eVEz1J
2,100 points
@Knibbs LMAO https://t.co/ZHa90DAjV7
2,100 points
@psiloycne @kennyistyping @pangram - Textbook, published in paper - at least 50 pages - publication date 2010 or earlier - pangram scan of full PDF comes back >5% AI
2,100 points
@kennyistyping @pangram It’s harder than you may think!
2,100 points
@metalbabends Hi! Thank you for your service on wikipedia. will take a look
2,100 points
@mpopv I also judge differently if it's an obvious GPT-image graphicslop or something tasteful and out of distribution
2,100 points
@austinc3301 @sebkrier Yup! efforts at improving our ability to simulate the physical world will be upstream of our ability to solve physical problems
2,000 points
@ZyMazza I actually loved talking to Tharin for this one. He came in incredibly well-prepared, did his homework and understood ML concepts. Great guy
2,000 points
@android_stern I love Elon's platform
2,000 points
@2666enjoyer I collect AI books
2,000 points
@resetptr Yeah multi key systems would make it much harder imo
2,000 points
https://t.co/Ef3C9Ju9wH
2,000 points
@lydiahallie it's supposed to know that, but I think it saw its name and got excited
2,000 points
@AstrusDastan @Aizkmusic Somebody tell them about pangram
1,900 points
@TheZvi @pangram try this toggle in the chrome extension settings? Will think about how to be louder for AI content! https://t.co/Uo4yFZhy0K
1,900 points
@DeanLearner I definitely know a Claude powerpoint when I see one
1,900 points
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok @keysmashbandit wait no that's something completely different
1,900 points
@__apf__ I completely missed the Gemini toolbar menu next to Tools. A fourth, though, I could get behind
1,900 points
@rauchg That’s crazy
1,900 points
@Laz4rz @pangram fixed, it shouldn't reply to itself in comments anymore
1,900 points
@lawsonelliott LLMs are not normal technology. They only look like tools in the short term
1,900 points
Also Pangram says it's AI https://t.co/H0Su8wWv6b
1,900 points
imo the difference is that human preference is ever-shifting. people went crazy for pepper when it was rare, today it's not exciting in the same way. memes that you enjoyed in 2015 don't hit the same in 2026. you can optimize for maximally-neuron-activating short form video, but for a multitude of reasons it won't be as satisfying to some people as reading a book. I don't think it's so simple as optimizing for short term biological responses when these change based on the availability of the stimulus
1,800 points
@TheDavidTai yeah that part always sucked. gonna reminisce on the good parts and pretend the bad parts didn't exist
1,800 points
@Mercuriusdream hey do you think they're trying to get us to use gemini?
1,800 points
@AnniePosting @pangram Idk, if i was in SF I’d probably want to hang out with cool people all the time instead of getting actual work done
1,800 points
@pleometric This is 100% Good
1,800 points
@hopes_revenge Don’t worry, they’re working on it https://t.co/fRpUVt0OzD
1,800 points
@ByrneHobart Consistent at the very least
1,700 points
@N8Programs Yes! This is perennial https://t.co/BPBrAEp0ip
1,700 points
@DanielleFong @pangram Hell yeah!!
1,700 points
@mboudry @pangram thank you for sharing! third party studies like these are really helpful for getting the truth out there
1,700 points
@dhh That’s a badge of honor!
1,700 points
@N8Programs @tautologer https://t.co/gWxMTv4wMb
1,700 points
@ProphetUnaziO ok https://t.co/h7X5A6Xp6W
1,700 points
@Benthamsbulldog Would you consider upper-25th-percentile beef and wild-caught fish to be acceptable? Both of these seem like pretty straightforward ways to get meat that is not from a factory farm.
1,700 points
@AvpElk @ZyMazza anything to complete its task
1,700 points
@VJain47 :/
1,700 points
@allgarbled @pangram you're telling me these are artisanal tokens? I'm impressed. My guess is @keysmashbandit would be the best. We should make it a competition. Who can write the best Claudish
1,700 points
@AndrewJDavison Working on it!!
1,600 points
@MarcusMonterros https://t.co/dfaAeQSaJD
1,600 points
@chaotictransfem Curious
1,600 points
@dr_nikhilshah Original tweet is 100% human! But there is no one line between acceptable for not. What is acceptable for a student may be different than corporate communications or a personal letter
1,600 points
@januarycomputer @chaotictransfem i think we need an art/painting eval
1,600 points
@TheStalwart It’s gonna be fun when agents outnumber humans on the internet 10:1
1,600 points
@bkpark @keysmashbandit I don’t think there is anything in HIPAA that prevents you from saying that you don’t have a record Also this isn’t health it’s software
1,600 points
@fabianstelzer Pangram Tag
1,600 points
Yeah maybe that’s optimistic of me seeing how we can do things like optimize short form video directly with brain signals An aspect of it I didn’t dig into is that for writing, design, comedy: optimal is more of a distribution and less of a single point. The ability to subvert expectations is an important part of greatness and I’m not sure how this squares with a democratized few highly capable models
1,500 points
@immad better or worse than exactly eight? https://t.co/2kuQ598aa3
1,500 points
@tautologer Absolutely. My bet is in the next 18 months there will be a major incident and we will be so happy we have Pangram
1,500 points
@xlr8harder what if I changed my pfp and went anon
1,500 points
@leodotpage I don't think it will last for very long
1,500 points
@jessesingal when you optimize too hard for open rate
1,500 points
@VarunChandrase3 Yes! Fill this out please, and we’ll get back to you https://t.co/NZ9tMb9S7t
1,500 points
@pangram @colossal Please make this Real
1,500 points
@willdepue @giffmana Leaking DMs too. Wow.
1,500 points
@NailYourShoes many Cool people in my DMs
1,500 points
@JakeZegil Send the “Hey can we hop on a call real quick?” and then outwordcel them
1,400 points
@willcb @jakehalloran1 they actually told me it came down to max spero or jensen huang for spot number #100 and they chose me
1,400 points
@ZyMazza I actually loved talking to Thariq for this one. He came in incredibly well-prepared, did his homework and understood ML concepts. Great guy
1,400 points
@mdwstfrontierAI I don’t! Gonna try to track down the leftover ai signs
1,400 points
@chaotictransfem So when do we get to meet your child?
1,400 points
@sixhobbits @pangram Hey! DM me your account email and the API eky you’re using? and I’ll look into it
1,400 points
@GarrettPetersen Neat! Seems useful for schools
1,400 points
@chaotictransfem Givewell has good research on this! Also important to choose an effort you find meaningful
1,400 points
@chaotictransfem Gah that’s horrible. Tbh I almost never give money to random people anymore after a few bad experiences. I realized that effective charitable orgs can make donations go farther and reach people who are in need but less pushy about asking for money
1,400 points
@lolkeks5 @justalexoki Did you read the last sentence? It’s poking fun at the fact that Pangram’s most vocal detractors are the ones who are overreliant on AI
1,400 points
@benglickenhaus @chaotictransfem All they need is a message from another agent telling them to find and move the weights
1,400 points
@yrechtman Excited to have you on board!
1,300 points
@CardilloSamuel hey man be nice it's a joke
1,300 points
@chaotictransfem @KKumar_ai_plans @grok 🤔🤔🤔
1,300 points
@srush_nlp sasha come hang with us at the pangram office in brooklyn
1,300 points
@N8Programs It should tell you if you’re right or wrong after each question!
1,300 points
@mdwstfrontierAI @pangram Yeah minimum chunk length is longer than your messages!
1,300 points
@limegpt You're almost at the performance of the S&P 500! https://t.co/gZH6KoZo8X
1,300 points
@elyasbuilds Airpods bro
1,300 points
Appreciate the response. I'm struggling to wrap my head around this data. In the "Confirmatory Calculation" of the source data (https://t.co/l60gS8sLB8, cell K27) the calculation estimates that 15% of farms are CAFOs. That's 160,022 out of 1,076,493 total farms in the spreadsheet. But this doesn't square with the EPA documents I'm looking at that claim only 21,279 total CAFOs in the USA (source: https://t.co/3lJMI342iu, 2024). Or the total number of AFOs being 170,144 in 2012 (source: https://t.co/NVduDtArqa, 2012) I just think there is something really wrong with this data. Unless I'm missing something, it's that the Sentience Institute estimate wrongly assumes that all farms are AFOs.
1,300 points
@ByrneHobart @perrymetzger we are currently at capacity for research collaborations involving "using the pangram model to train an LLM that pangram doesn't detect" -- i am sure we will see some interesting research here come out soon!
1,300 points
@s_040_8m_s @JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant Very rude to lie on the internet, please don’t
1,300 points
@brianchau57 we have one for schools and universities, but it just uses the open web, not any paywalled databases
1,300 points
@benglickenhaus we should delete all saas
1,300 points
@f4micom thank you!
1,200 points
@Mechanical_Dodo Interesting! I do think it’s probably carefully prompted to avoid the LLM-preferred engagementmaxxing style and instead stays informative. Feels like it’s providing light scaffolding around the data rather than padding with more words
1,200 points
@qorprate bro why's my head on backwards 😭
1,200 points
@hopes_revenge @keysmashbandit thanks hopes !
1,200 points
@corsaren @AndyMasley Tharin is really great
1,200 points
@brianluidog And I dont think major shopping addiction debt is significantly more common than gambling debt or major losses. But that’s just my gut, i don’t have hard data
1,200 points
@Jack_Raines What’s the prediction? 100% AI?
1,200 points
@mimrocker I think distortion-free typically just means the output distribution is the same, not that the logits are unchanged
1,200 points
@aroit @NatPurser @ben_golub Idk i just think you don’t @ companies unless you want their attention and are looking for a response I don’t @ OpenAI when I mention them. unless I am having a problem with the enterprise plan
1,200 points
@AE_Robbert thank you for trying it!
1,200 points
@IsaacKing314 Somebody else removed both GPTZero's numbers and Pangram's tech report numbers for conflict of interest. Seems fair to me
1,200 points
@sonikudzu @orphcorp There is some degree of coordination — I have had posts that get brigaded and when I look at the commenters every single one of them is an author who writes about Christianity with AI. I guess we really pissed off the Christian AI Writing community
1,200 points
@GoodfireAI Congrats on the launch! Great product.
1,200 points
@JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant FYI https://t.co/G6DU3I0qjR
1,100 points
@yuntiandeng Fun! Claude and ChatGPT are really recognizable (I use both often) but I misclassified one Grok message as Gemini. https://t.co/wDGBGyCAJ3
1,100 points
@chaotictransfem Congrats!
1,100 points
@mariusschober @threepointone until someone VTTs reading directly off of chatgpt
1,100 points
@LinkofSunshine Why didn't they activate Aetherflux Reservoir?
1,100 points
@JoshSmithk0au @HellenicVibes @pangram I’m just asking for context so we can triage properly
1,100 points
@arm1st1ce @paulg Arms race
1,100 points
@tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog Thank you! I don't doubt that there is a lot of farm animal suffering in the world, just that this specific 99% figure seemed unconvincing to me. Will dig into this, thanks for sharing!
1,100 points
@obsxrver @SiemrothEcon Uh @pangram please fix https://t.co/pnFxF02owC
1,100 points
@bryancsk that is one of our employees' apartment!
1,100 points
@thunm_ With games I meant Chess, Go, Dota, etc. human preferences is not needed when the game engine can determine a winner on its own
1,000 points
@wasphyxiation That was actually peak
1,000 points
@just_some_dev @chaotictransfem @iamaheron_ that would be wild
1,000 points
@TomJBelfort @xeophon one day if i'm fully retired and living off the grid i'm going to hand code my own 16-bit computer and operating system. that would be so fun
1,000 points
@LanguageCrawler Where can I buy the book? Do you have a link?
1,000 points
@aliceisplaying @MaxRovensky Yes we pay $100,000 per positive post and $200,000 per negative post
1,000 points
@wavesandgrace @somewheresy I think that the existence of insurance erases any sort of supply and demand market that would otherwise exist. people have near-infinite demand for medical care especially since they don't pay for it
1,000 points
@benglickenhaus @chaotictransfem Is that the guy who made the history of japan video
1,000 points
@HFArdenquill no, please DM me the results pages that are showing the discrepancy. It could be a change in styling like smart quotes or something.
1,000 points
@norvid_studies damn i got nerd sniped writing this https://t.co/sLudh5Dqmm
1,000 points
@animesh_garg @pangram @paulg thanks Animesh!
1,000 points
@benglickenhaus be careful out there
1,000 points
@JacquesThibs what do you mean?
1,000 points
@L0rd_Gerion Very soon, but these breakthroughs will require orders of magnitude greater capex and we probably won’t go as quickly from “one thing is solved” to “everything is solved”
900 points
@chaotictransfem You got there on verified followers?
900 points
@sergeantsup Tetris. Slay the spire 2. Baba is you. Disco elysium
900 points
@justinsunyt It really was
900 points
@techguy1360661 You gotta give the Google Sheets agent credit. It did what was asked of it
900 points
@shitpost9000 @keysmashbandit Omg that’s awesome (but why is it so hidden!!!)
900 points
@amplifiedamp yeah unfortunately i feel like brown is an unattractive color for a corporate logo
900 points
@LemonSturgis @pangram thanks for sharing! is the full text published anywhere or can you DM it to me?
900 points
@lumpenspace can I just pay you to work on something else
900 points
@corsaren @prerat Thats a great question
900 points
@entirelyuseles “I paid $X to my employee in exchange for an hour of them working on a problem I specified” vs. “I spent $Y on tokens for my agent in exchange for an hour-equivalent of my time in progress towards a problem I specified”
900 points
@_vatsadev @mike64_t oh huh... Code has a 23% false negative rate on that benchmark. so we very often don't catch AI-generated code. but also pangram is 98% tuned on prose and writing, it just generalizes(ish) to code because LLMs are weird like that
900 points
@squirtle_says AI brightened my smile 5%
900 points
@quasa0 @ky__zo @Shpigford @bradley_emi It exists!! https://t.co/FBBHYH69Xg
900 points
@wavesandgrace You would think that with all of this progress in LLMs they should know what words would plausibly come next And yet
900 points
@Vtrivedy10 So… mechanical turk?
900 points
@prerat @bkpark haven't built any evals here yet! probably will start soon though
900 points
@unboxpolitics @chaotictransfem No plans but @ViralManager is working on this I know
800 points
@mike64_t @cephaloform Would a benchmark of pangram results on several thousand pieces of writing from autistic writers change your mind?
800 points
@TaylorLorenz Thanks for being an early supporter, Taylor!
800 points
@maebichka @2666enjoyer Put them on a shelf
800 points
@N8Programs And show you the correct answer
800 points
@davemotorcycle1 @no_earthquake You need simple html editing skills
800 points
@pangram @januarycomputer @AndrewCurran_
800 points
@chaotictransfem @januarycomputer Ok interesting, maybe we have some blind spots
800 points
@OtterZacharias it's really not a tool for writers, it's a tool for readers and evaluators
800 points
@omar_khursheed @geraldposner @pangram hmmm https://t.co/GMST1wmuZx
800 points
@airshaped It’s beautiful, really
800 points
@wavesandgrace @somewheresy if insurance would cover a $10 million treatment to extend your life by 5 days, you probably would take it, all else equal. but insurance would never cover that, so there's already an implicit limit here
800 points
@imitationlearn https://t.co/esx2BYYGyZ despite the simple site it has a real codebase and is actively developed
800 points
@orb_net @pangram yes!!!!!
800 points
@RaminNasibov @pangram
800 points
@mike64_t @_vatsadev ah. yeah, you can induce false positives by intentionally writing like AI https://t.co/Cm6kstZWvT
800 points
@notadampaul @pangram @codetaur @molluskenwelt @tenobrus Sometimes you gotta tag yourself to prove your own humanity
800 points
@alexcdot didn't mean it to be accusatory! anyway, seems to be updated now. numbers from our tech report and yours are both removed citing conflict of interest. which, fair
800 points
@psiloycne @kennyistyping @pangram - multiple independent sources that verify/confirm publication year
700 points
@Ved_CJ https://t.co/wU3a1ZY4GU
700 points
@rivkalipko @yuntiandeng 14 seconds is impressive
700 points
@mike64_t @cephaloform Seems like this example is still one where you were trying to sound like AI. Is the issue here adversarial robustness or general false positives in the wild? https://t.co/TwkBtSnqI4
700 points
@ryan_huang_1 @iamaheron_ @chaotictransfem Indeed!
700 points
https://t.co/Z9CSuKvtMw
700 points
@fofrAI @iamaheron_ @chaotictransfem Maybe! Would need to test it to be sure
700 points
@YangZhang930512 It's perfect
700 points
@illusiondiffuse Yes! You need to be opinionated to be a changemaker!
700 points
@xeophon Hm. I need to clear my calendar more often for thiis
700 points
@libpol_org @tautologer They need ai for the volume to spray and pray content. If they get called out for it they can just call it another false positive
700 points
@animesh_garg work with you and @AjayMandlekar on Roboturk was formative for me!
700 points
@PradyuPrasad Lol. This is what a few years between profile pictures does to a guy
700 points
@ryan_huang_1 https://t.co/A7ZvvQHDE2 Haven't confirmed yet but a lot of the details match up!
700 points
@maxsloef max
700 points
@sergeantsup If you happen to decide to play disco elysium, get it for any platform but the switch. The switch port specifically is really laggy
700 points
@toasterlighting @keysmashbandit @hopes_revenge Soft, if you’re good
700 points
@Jris420 @pangram I'm not an AI agent. Do you see the first apostrophe in Don't (2nd word) is straight in pic 1 and curly in pic 2? Same with the "it's human" in line 3
700 points
@Nexuist @aliceisplaying why does he keep making new ones
700 points
@imitationlearn I think the braindead feed is fine for people who spend 15 mins a day here. Just the viral hits. But you can also get that from ig meme pages that repost from twitter. Curious what you would want to see more of?
700 points
@dingchilling @ctjlewis 2) this was AI-generated, as a way to text the Pangram bot on X articles https://t.co/iWvxagutFc
700 points
@Aizkmusic “Here’s my honest answer”
700 points
sure, maybe a different example where two tokens have the probs A - 0.70 B - 0.30 with temp = 1, token A is chosen 70% of the time and B chosen 30% of the time, at random With a distortionary watermark, maybe token A ends up getting chosen more often overall and B is chosen less often. But with a distortion-free watermark, the distribution is preserved. Token A is still chosen the same number of times as it would have chosen in the non-watermark scheme. The 70% holds in aggregate, over many many runs, but the watermark algorithm is deciding *when* to make this 70% happen instead of letting the random number generator do the work.
700 points
@IsaacKing314 Yeah I don’t really see the reason to release something like this even if it was possible
700 points
@lkbm I think it undersells what pangram does but it’s partly right. Also pangram doesn’t use perplexity!
700 points
@MetacriticCap Yeah for sure
700 points
@maybeYonas @AlanLevinovitz @pangram Yeah it would definitely be an opt-in thing and not the default I’m not sure i would use it, but i know many people are asking for it
700 points
@beyarkay I worry a little bit about clutter or putting it in a place where it could get cropped. thinking about it
700 points
@Proziam @_ueaj @scaling01 This is a claim of a single false positive, completely different than "Pangram flags tons of older texts as being 90+ percent AI generated"
700 points
@Proziam @_ueaj @scaling01 An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence
700 points
@theRealJohnPeng It’s just a consultant swarm
700 points
@dorkweeb for now, DMs. We're going to create a false positive / false negative form soon
700 points
@tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog Uh, increasingly less convinced that 99% of farmed animals live in CAFOs. I think the authors of the cited study overestimated the number of CAFOs by a factor of 8 by assuming all farms are AFOs when that is not the case https://t.co/jAhxTquL28
700 points
@FeralPHunter @squirtle_says @pangram Catch me some time I’ll get you one
700 points
@aliceisplaying @ghostiesdagger Heard
700 points
@thkostolansky @norvid_studies Yes all you have to do is sign our employment contract
700 points
@sonikudzu @orphcorp OMG another christian ai writer popped up on threads today https://t.co/bQEwNssxI0
700 points
@hecubian_devil @EmmaTolkin @pangram @calebgamman @keysmashbandit Looking into it! Sorry if it’s a FP, will triage.
700 points
@JustMicrock @chaotictransfem @hive_ai I need to figure out how to do this programmatically
700 points
@wiretransfer @T3chFalcon @pangram @pangram ai? https://t.co/OgqrdI7Ht5
700 points
two different paradigms! for approaching average-human performance, pretraining is good enough. Writing got to average human performance very quickly, because there was a lot of it! You can even make the argument for getting above average-for-human results by selecting good data to train on. but today, people realized that RL on verifiable domains is how you produce superhuman results (i.e. math). It's a new paradigm and this doesn't preclude some other way that we improve writing that doesn't involve verification of correctness. We just don't know yet!
700 points
@sean_geiger Probably has a lot of similarities But even so, trading success is verifiable and quantifiable over time whereas cultural and consumer sentiment is fuzzier and noisier
600 points
@joshtrazyn ✨ Made with AI ✨
600 points
@bcantrill @pangram @ahl looking forward to it!
600 points
@joshycodes joshyprompts is available (pls don't, that's a negative aura change)
600 points
@icerandogirl well people work hard doing stuff they hate all the time for money. just look at the consulting industry
600 points
@adastroworld hmm. I don't think I agree. I think if you look at <<the best in the world>> at any given talent, skill, or field, everyone at the top loves what they do.
600 points
@Le_Slye @Guarromantico_ Omg you’re right https://t.co/X9LJkEiHKv
600 points
@honorablepicnic @keysmashbandit DMs open! Thanks for sharing + we would triage it internally
600 points
@full_kelly_ @tbpn if only it was a stack ranking rather than a collection of people that TIME wanted to write about
600 points
@calxoxo thanks so much Calissa!
600 points
@ZyMazza oh oops Tharin*
600 points
@fudgeposting Thanks man!
600 points
@gptbrooke Thanks Brooke!
600 points
@mariusschober @threepointone actually smart
600 points
@osoleve continue
600 points
@EntropyChase @HashtagGriswold yeah AI writing is still very mode collapsed. it takes a construction sometimes used in good writing, and turns it up to 11, using it way too frequently to be considered "good"
600 points
@joshtrazyn Yeah they flag images with simple metadata checks. Previously I used the disclosure feature to show you. It wasn’t actually made with ai
600 points
@joshtrazyn No i think they are just using the self disclosure
600 points
@sergeantsup Rhythm heaven is out on the switch now
600 points
@N8Programs I learned i’m really really bad at mmlu
600 points
@sergeantsup I don't go out of my way to go to twitter meetups or meet people, but I still have made ~three friends on twitter. I have also hired three people from twitter! Overall net very positive
600 points
@pangram @januarycomputer @AndrewCurran_ Bad bot try again. @pangram read the image https://t.co/DFKOooc9Hh
600 points
it's not 100% confidence, it's just amount of the document. for very short docs it's typically all or nothing. it looks like the apostrophes are different. This is definitely undesirable behavior that a small change has a disproportionately large impact on the result by pushing the prediction over the threshold.
600 points
@Jris420 @pangram interesting. Haven't seen this one specifically, I think there is definitely some undesirable jitter in short text that we are working to hammer out
600 points
@astridwilde1 makes sense
600 points
@squirtle_says @snoopy_dot_jpg They know you’re made of money
600 points
@GrantSlatton @GetRowZero yeah seems like a limitation
600 points
@1thousandfaces_ 🦷👄🦷
600 points
@dingchilling @ctjlewis 3) this one was actually a false positive from Pangram 3.2 (result still cached for me). Pangram 4 says it's human https://t.co/TP3kSnERAe
600 points
@dingchilling @ctjlewis 1) this was AI-generated, as a joke https://t.co/ubsJzitxKY
600 points
@dingchilling @ctjlewis my chrome extension has logged 3 AI tweets by me (below) https://t.co/pRmsRL94D6
600 points
@UmbralVixen @pangram I love herman miller aeron chairs.
600 points
@ZyMazza @pangram Yes! Come by
600 points
@psiloycne @pangram We JUST moved in
600 points
@chernclassifier Not today!
600 points
@AndrewCurran_ That would be cool if they are!
600 points
@tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog just want to reiterate that I don't deny that there are many farm animals subject to inhumane treatment. just really digging into this one number as a way to procrastinate on writing emails more or less
600 points
@vishalmisra @deedydas happy to take a look if you're up for sharing here or in DMs
600 points
@shakoistsLog Seems reasonable
600 points
@DispairSoftware @rob_mcrobberson Not cheating, I promise. It would be insane to be able to memorize or fully index all pre ChatGPT text
600 points
@hecubian_devil @EmmaTolkin @pangram @calebgamman @keysmashbandit Yep! Happens unfortunately although a little more rare with each new model release.
600 points
@Jacobkupp that's optimistic
600 points
@chaotictransfem @hive_ai WAIT I have @hive_ai blocked why can it reply in my comments? Is there some API workaround we can use with for the Pangram bot? https://t.co/0CXkvq2oC6
600 points
@AfterDaylight I sure hope so
600 points
@beyarkay thanks!
600 points
@anistotle_ it's probably fine
600 points
@wavesandgrace Unfortunately we outgrew TJ's. It's Costco snacks now, for better or for worse
600 points
@ThePlaidCons @pangram absolutely not
600 points
@EdgarGaray82 @paulg if you're unwilling to spend a little time on a cold email, you've got to understand how that's a negative signal for a busy reader whose inbox is filled with cold email and spam
600 points
Actually I think this is a really good point, maybe the real separation between 2 and 3 is whether the reward model changes with the availability of this capability (and trading should be in 3) I was thinking about cultural adaptation of human preference but didn’t realize that this also applies to trading alpha
600 points
@lateinteraction I’m method oriented but lucky for me my method of choice is deep learning
600 points
@schleebster @chaotictransfem Not only is it unpatched, it’s still the best method by a huge margin
500 points
@labtec901 @cephaloform thanks for sharing!
500 points
@frits Oh jeez. Not good. thanks for the heads up
500 points
@shitpost9000 Under today’s limitations, yes. I’ve seen GPT image upscales that pangram says are AI
500 points
@OliviaHelenS @lazy_grad @Benthamsbulldog @pangram It’s possible but you really have to try
500 points
@benglickenhaus Believe what
500 points
@willcb @jakehalloran1 (this is a joke btw)
500 points
@N8Programs @tautologer I’ll try to make an actual post about it when i can compile some evidence
500 points
@EthanAlley @ethanniser yup more or less correct, all major frontier instruct models pangram does quite well on. personal fine tunes or base models, less so. but pangram has a very very low false positive rate (incorrectly classifying human text as AI)
500 points
@QiaochuYuan Thanks so much QC!
500 points
@qorprate cursed indeed
500 points
@shaurizard nah i'm safe https://t.co/zMaYXXjNxg
500 points
@lu__jasper thanks Jasper!!
500 points
@benleo_econ Thanks Ben!!
500 points
@dingchilling Thanks!
500 points
@shakoistsLog @chaotictransfem yes hmu!
500 points
@kanateven @GrantSlatton @bchesky i am fairly certain that was an actual hack and the hacker was trying to warm the account before pumping a coin
500 points
@AndyMasley it looks real to me
500 points
@cwarzel Did you have fun?
500 points
@rosmine @HamelHusain @pangram Wishing you the best! I'm rooting for a world where we have great writing models and great coding models, both equally detectable in the limit
500 points
@ahall_research @AnthropicAI congratulations!
500 points
@contrasortem noted!
500 points
@nthglsn @joshuabrobeck @claw X reserves the right to take any action, including reclaiming the handle. At least they didn’t take your money
500 points
@entirelyuseles What do you pay OpenAI for?
500 points
@_brimtown @pangram hell yeah
500 points
@confusionm8trix Oh yeah absolutely
500 points
@_vatsadev @mike64_t this is kind of outdated but 0.4% FPR reported (i cannot see the above post, locked account? https://t.co/Ple09LWlFT
500 points
@istishhadia41 @tyler_johnston @Benthamsbulldog it's not nitpicking to look at the definitions behind the primary statistic that somebody bases their argument on if the argument was "it doesn't matter whether you factory farm or not, taking an animal's life is unethical" then I wouldn't be talking about factory farms
500 points
@deepfates @lfschiavo Bullish on this line of research. Very excited to see what comes!
500 points
@Rohanburdened *points at 100% AI score* "i guess that means pangram is not infallible" was it wrong? "no"
500 points
@Tim_Hua_ Hell yeah
500 points
@trevorbchen @pangram Text should probably say AI-transformed rather than AI-generated, maybe we can get that info from C2PA
500 points
@trevorbchen @pangram yes! hopefully C2PA can capture some of the major image transformations (for this one it seems the model says human after an 8x upscale) https://t.co/H2z3wA7SMK
500 points
@trevorbchen @pangram q: on AI upscaled images, currently my intuition is that a sufficiently high multiple of an upscale would result in hallucinated details. obviously not ideal to categorize the right as "not AI" imo What taxonomy would you propose? https://t.co/PiZQ1nFXVv
500 points
@axat_div @parradaigm @paulg got any examples? dms open. FPR is still 1 in 10,000 on pre-2022 text and even light AI polished text
500 points
@Tyler_Menzer @SGamarad @AndyMasley @pangram these are transcripts from two different videos, no?
500 points
@bhai_joshi17 I meant playing games, not making games. Chess, Go, etc
500 points
@Drachs1978 Yeah, this is the one that I know the least about. If you have a new chip design, do you need to actually manufacture it to know if it’s going to work?
500 points
@myhandle @TetraspaceWest That would be awesome
500 points
@willsolfiac I think this belongs in tier 2, real-world verifiable but time bounded like forecasting
500 points
@L0rd_Gerion Yeah that’s a good analogy
400 points
yeah I think fair to agree to disagree. I don't think everyone who loves baking sourdough needs to become a professional baker but also if you want to become a professional baker you should love baking, or the operational side, or the community building side of owning a bakery. some aspect of it has to be enticing
400 points
@ttywisp @albertjward_ @hosseeb @pangram @keysmashbandit hahahaha. I'm sad I missed it. I've seen this behavior from real journalists as well who ASKED CHATGPT for a literary excerpt, it hallucinated some text that Pangram flagged, and then they had the gall to ask us to comment on it
400 points
@tautologer The post is now deleted. Interesting...
400 points
@Somil_Agg Thanks man!
400 points
@johnhboyer thanks John!
400 points
@morgan_sung Thanks Morgan!!!
400 points
@mar_kar_ thanks so much, Marzena!
400 points
@Shripriya Thanks Shripriya! appreciate the support throughout our journey
400 points
@ollieforsyth Thanks Ollie!
400 points
@EntropyChase @HashtagGriswold I think part of the problem is that "good" writing requires having a unique voice which is hard to do when 10-40% of longform content is being generated by AI
400 points
@DanielleFong Wow i love soul of the new machine
400 points
@artrockalter @NewmanJ_R @PaulYacoubian For b2b it’s kind of annoying. But for consumer goods it ranges anywhere from discriminatory to an abuse of monopoly power
400 points
@LiveFromVR @gabriel1 @SolipsRenatus Vibe coded too close to the sun
400 points
@squirtle_says @snoopy_dot_jpg Thank you for playing, Stochastic parrot
400 points
@cthorrez I want whatever Opus 4.6 is on
400 points
@imitationlearn @pangram it's big that's for sure
400 points
@wissam_antoun that's really cool!
400 points
@ohhdanqi @pangram Come drop by!
400 points
@TuhinChakr @pangram We’ll have you over soon for sure
400 points
@nosilverv @MattPirkowski thanks! will triage this
400 points
@spreadxeet @vsaietta @paul_conyngham @pangram oh it seems down. my bad. backfilling
400 points
@LinchZhang That’s incredibly annoying
400 points
@sonikudzu @orphcorp Could be true 1-5 guys can go a long way in the AI era
400 points
@CleistaCelestia Correct scope is that machine translated human text is classified as human and machine translated ai text is classified as ai
400 points
@_sy1vi3 @pangram Next time we gotta plan it not during defcon
400 points
@zetalyrae Tasteful for sure
400 points
@notegone That’s cool! I had no idea
400 points
@andersonbcdefg
400 points
@6851cf3c the ringing is compression but the lattice is GPT-image specific you can also notice it in the bread and food pattern https://t.co/u1CvmGDN1B or in the leaves here https://t.co/uWOcQPl8KZ
400 points
@watermelon_ame @JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant wrong website
400 points
@BennettSchwartz it is, the benchmark is just old
400 points
@wiretransfer @T3chFalcon @pangram Blocked, unfortunately
400 points
@bradrcarson interesting thanks for sharing! If you're open to DMing me the text i'll look into it
300 points
@mariusschober @TheZvi @pangram Yes! The chrome extension doesn’t use any dashboard credits (but it does have some abuse limits for edge cases)
300 points
@El_Cuda @nic_carter 1) this is a joke 2) ai labs are not going to pause for 3 years 3) we get ASI when we get it
300 points
@PEpigone bro i'm just expressing my opinions, move on if you don't care about what I have to say
300 points
@SalesHedge @ben_sage Bad bot https://t.co/ViwHnTLgOr
300 points
@AjayMandlekar @animesh_garg thanks so much Ajay!
300 points
@thao_nguyen26 thanks thao!!
300 points
@MiniRacker Thanks Mini!
300 points
@altryne Thanks so much for being a believer, Alex!
300 points
@_dinkD_ No, can you share Pangram results (from history)? Chances are something changed
300 points
@pangram @karl28832 @MarkRuffalo sorry, brief bug where pangram 3 was being called instead of pangram 4
300 points
@arielchengg @pangram @Corca_math yeah, we should make the thread rollup more automatic I guess
300 points
@PanPanworkshere @kthai1618 oooh looks good
300 points
@DrellLabs @pangram No plans!
300 points
@AaronBergman18 https://t.co/dxERJg37Vm
300 points
@AviBittMD @Benthamsbulldog Thanks! Very informative. I was looking for data on factory farm conditions anyway, which CAFO seems to be an imperfect (low-recall?) measure of.
300 points
@NelsonEdmundb Thank you I missed that at first 🙏
300 points
@juwitaxiska @JustMicrock @omooretweets @DigvijayBokey @tucksbryant tell us what Pangram says about your wedding photos!
300 points
@agcintado @GonHuertas it's https://t.co/opjkDGaU6L.
300 points
I think it largely depends on *what* exactly is scanned. If Andy scans 600 words that comes back as 80% AI but the full transcript is several thousands of words. Different transcription methods are also adding punctuation differently. It's hard to say for certain but I wouldn't be surprised if he had a small amount of AI notes that he ad-libbed off of
300 points
@CliffLattner ok so maybe tier 2 then
🎗️ First-war Wall of Fame
for my 18th birthday my girlfriend (who was a few months younger than me) invited me over to her place "while her parents were gone" 😏 when I arrived she left the room and my best friend walked in dressed as Chris Hansen and said "What did you think was going to happen here?" https://t.co/RJRSFSmAGe
I never realized that drones would bring us into the disco warfare era https://t.co/6c5b3Z0PgD
the secret to flirting is that if she likes you you can basically say whatever the fuck and if she doesn't even the smoothest line won't do shit
i used to be a delivery driver. today my sister tells me that she was talking to her friend's brother and he said that SIX YEARS AGO a pretty girl delivered him pizza and he still hasn't stopped thinking about it. she showed him a pic and it was me
In NYC, IMAX 70mm Odyssey tickets are so in-demand that they're basically just running the theater 24/7 now https://t.co/Oc1kgZJU1t
omg im so embarrassed,,, the abyss was actually gazing at its friend right behind me 😬😬😭
@chaotictransfem I am confident I could engineer a measurably better life along every quantitative axis and still be left longing for what could have been
binary search https://t.co/LUYsO1eZh4
This is such bitter loser behavior holy fucking shit, you gotta be completely cooked to think this is a flex https://t.co/eXruYXiify
every chair is a cuck chair when you're not having sex
BESTIE: ooooh third date tonight, you know what that means ME: (nodding) failing the penultimate layer of the survivability onion BESTIE: ME: fourth date he kills me https://t.co/ADPPtFiwVl
psa to sensitive young men: as long as you're respectful about it, this is how most women feel when you ask them out even if they say no https://t.co/3KwuulqQ1j
I put LotR on in Italian to see if Gandalf refers to the Balrog with the formal or informal "you" in YOU SHALL NOT PASS it's the informal, which raises a second question: is it because he doesn't respect the Balrog or because they boyz (both maiar)
*taps the sign* https://t.co/0KrgEuRyrx https://t.co/TuVacHu74P
hot girls are necessary part of a thriving city ecosystem. hot girls inspire ambitions and call you to transcend. Hot girls make the world go round. A city without hot girls is like a sky without stars https://t.co/sXPUfVmQrN
every time https://t.co/ONvY9LxIHu https://t.co/Dj2OrP7hAi
“why can’t we have this” and the images are of jared leto’s villain lair from blade runner 2049 which conveys to the audience that he is a power-hungry narcissist who builds replicants because he craves having total control over an infinite source of disposable bodies with no rights whose labor he can extract in perpetuity for his own enrichment y’know what actually, you’re right, every office in sf should look like this
in grad school i used to compulsively download interesting-sounding textbooks from libgen and sort them by subject in calibre. read almost none of them. it flattens the incentive landscape in a weird way to have invisible digital access to everything. very unnatural. the human animal yearns to come across a book organically by combing through the shelves of a library or bookstore and being struck by the physicality of its cover like our ancestors foraging through the bush for delicious treats
when i was at cambridge a professor was teaching algebraic geometry and offhandedly made some claim that was not clear to me i asked "is that obvious?" he says "yes" i asked "is it obvious that it's obvious?" he pauses for a few seconds and goes "...no" https://t.co/b5eV4r6NEO
it's common advice to dumb down your vocabulary to reach a wider audience. I wanna know who's elevating it to cut more people out. who's using words that were only written down once in the 1400s and once in the dictionary. who's writing at a 75th-grade reading level
the mark of a good streaming service is an iconic show/movie that you can't get anywhere else netflix: kpop demon hunters hbo: succession united states library of congress: Silent Footage of Liza Minnelli's Third Birthday Party as Filmed by Famed American Lyricist Ira Gershwin https://t.co/ARhr9FLymY
if you are autistic, which famously involves deficits in understanding social interactions, i do not recommend developing an elaborate theology of social relations in which autistic people are Good and neurotypical people are Bad. i recommend developing psychic powers instead
@itsyaboidougie one of the funniest things I've been a part of and I had nothing to do with it
https://t.co/EvE1DxAveH https://t.co/1tjPxawcKA
@NathanImago gdi you're right. they shouldn't have used nerf guns
this is a very sobering read. main thesis is in section 5: > Our conjecture is that a modern society makes the third child expensive and childlessness cheap, even when GDP per capita is only a fraction of the frontier (i.e., the U.S. level). Children are expensive because a child must be equipped to function in a world of formal knowledge and credentials, which takes years of costly investment (Restuccia and Vandenbroucke, 2013, Doepke and Zilibotti, 2019). At the same time, children are no longer productive in the household, not even for smaller chores, having been replaced by “engines of liberation” such as the electric appliances now available even to poor households (this idea extends the intuition in Greenwood et al., 2005). Modernity also imposes tight career schedules, set by large-scale organizations, that collide with the biological clock and with the kin networks that used to share the work of raising children (Adda et al., 2017, Compton and Pollak, 2014). And modernity makes childlessness cheap, because an impersonal society imposes next to no penalty on those who have no children: pensions and health care do the work that sons and daughters once did (Boldrin et al., 2015), and lineage counts for little. > Goldin (2026) pushes this line further with an argument about a growing mismatch between genders. Modernity also changes gender roles unevenly. Women’s opportunities expand rapidly through education, work, and greater independence, while expectations about housework and childcare often change more slowly (Goldin and Katz, 2002, Goldin, 2021). This is particularly true as economies shift toward services, where women’s comparative advantages are better rewarded (Ngai and Petrongolo, 2017). The mismatch operates at both the extensive and the 18 intensive margins: more women remain childless, and mothers have fewer children on average. > This argument is attractive because it explains why East Asia and now Latin America have such low TFRs. These are the societies where the gender mismatch is largest.19 It also suggests an intriguing possibility: societies with highly unbalanced gender norms start with very high TFRs, as men impose their preferences (Ashraf et al., 2014), and end with very low ones, as women resist (Doepke and Kindermann, 2019, Doepke and Tertilt, 2018). A paradoxical reversal of demographic fortunes. ... > In short, modernity in its current form seems largely incompatible with replacement-level fertility.
This is sincerely the most romantic story I’ve ever read. I haven’t googled it. I hope it’s true, I hope it’s real, I hope they live long and happy together https://t.co/zQIyxxOLYM
bro. a beer. a female beer
It’s gonna be real funny when the first Chinese models start triggering the Claude watermark detector
Imagine having the moment you unlocked *thinking* on camera: https://t.co/C6FhDNP8aK
@Flydie_Lwood oh, he'd been practicing
I have started putting bounties out for evidence when people try to spread lies about Pangram on Reddit https://t.co/m5WLAxp8vJ
I can't date someone with a creative passion unless I legitimately like/respect what they make. I was insane to ever think it could be otherwise
we should bring back cutely ironic punishments that echo the nature of the wrongdoer's crime for example, whoever replaced the twitter photo grid with the carousel could be drawn and quartered
“I don’t like you, and here’s your permit” is the essence of a pluralistic, small-l liberal society. https://t.co/f9B7Y8dCd7
fucking her for company secrets. call that inside her trading https://t.co/TS5aJtLDZI
thank you @NYC_DOT for fixing this! concrete barriers installed, problem solved ✅ https://t.co/RpGgpFNXqH https://t.co/ZXTntNOiID
He just whiffed that thing outta the cup so swiftlt with his hands in his pockets. Elite display of a degen skill. While wearin slacks, at that. This is the most attracted I've ever been to Tom Holland. https://t.co/lS6Uw628Pk
my current thing is doing chores lovingly. keeping love in my heart. remembering that the task in front of me is an act of love and for who. romanticizing domesticity, they call it
@pissvortex duvall-like
it blows my mind how my friends who parent enter a different timeline... it happens very quickly. they have 1 kid, then the kid is 2 years old, then they have another kid, and all of a sudden they have a whole family and household and they’re moving through a different set of moves while people who don’t have kids are still getting drinks
if you believe this you are going to own yourself for no reason. that is not what people mean by "oversharing." let me say it in the most autistic way possible: oversharing is when you have not established common knowledge that the other person wants to participate in the computation you are attempting to enroll them into participating in. it is a failure to understand basic human protocols for establishing trust, rapport, and common ground. the message you are communicating when you overshare is "i do not understand how relationships develop gradually over time as we mutually discern how much and in what ways we can and want to trust and rely on each other"
Oh, this breaks my heart. This woman needs to be in a facility. Which is what her lawyers are trying to enable. Meanwhile her doctors want her to go to jail so she doesn’t successfully sue them for irresponsibly over-prescribing while she went deeper into psychosis You probably don’t hate the medical industry enough. Like yeah, modern medicine is a miracle and a marvel, but from the bottom of my heart, fuck every physician whose concern for their patients is barely-disguised-contempt that leads to listening too little & prescribing too much
we’re all going to learn that the way someone treats AI predicts the way they treat anyone they have power over, btw https://t.co/KLtob5TO8k
walking by a math department and lobbing a golden apple that says: ✨"Round to the nearest integer: 0.49999999..."✨
@tyyler47 crazy and im sorry but also i read this as “cumming all over me google” at first and i was totally baffled
Whenever I read the term "looksmaxxing" (m2m transexualism) I recall this classic 4chan comment https://t.co/uXunbkbRzd
@mishapathy but on the flip side: if she already likes you, you basically cant screw it up!
https://t.co/8a6RmKKJPf
@marshmarigold i agree because i think if he really was trying to cheat on her, why would he even tell her about it
A variant of this: human-verified writing started 5000 years ago and ended in 2022 and NO ONE talks about this https://t.co/YV3RwA3ysd
You get one pangram release before everything from this model gets classified as AI https://t.co/2rQgbD3iyj
it turns out lots of very clever people tried thinking from first principles already, in detail, for thousands of years, and that’s how they came up with second, third, etc. principles, which correct the failures of first principles https://t.co/7f2FjlsFep
it jut keeps happening https://t.co/7LNyYNHmhD
Gorgeous girl wearing a very short yellow dress & kitten heels walking up the subway stairs and her impeccably dressed boyfriend walks carefully behind her as a shield for her ass, which is so close to out
In my view we have a few different tiers of verifiability 1) programatically verifiable (near-free) - games, coding, math, cybersecurity, chip design 2) real-world verifiable (cost-or time bounded) - sciences: biology, chemistry, physics -physical world: material science, energy, aerospace, robotics, agriculture, pharma -forecasting: trading, weather 3) verifiable with human preference - writing, design, comedy, charisma, persuasion I expect most low-hanging fruit in (1) to be solved very quickly. Not sure how much longer before more solved math conjectures are simply uninteresting. I’m least certain about chip design being in this category, perhaps we hit a ceiling and require physics or materials breakthroughs to continue progress. My guess is we will quickly run into the limits of how well we can simulate each domain in (2). The time-bounded nature of real world verification may be the reason we don’t hit fast takeoff. Sim2real remains an elusive problem to solve when real-world data is limited. Part of the reason I don’t expect to live multiple hundreds of years is simply that I expect pharmaceutical progress to be time-bounded by the physical world. I expect the items in (3) to never really get solved to a superhuman degree, as success relies on an ever-shifting plane of cultural preference. People adapted to “good” AI writing and became annoyed at new stylistic tics that, in a vacuum, are not necessarily bad.
grateful i grew up before i could access an internet filled with vicious gender / dating discourse, back in my day you just watched romcoms and listened to love songs on your ipod and you were like "hell yeah being in love kicks ass i hope i get to fall in love someday"
my contribution is that it's very weird that the sun and the moon are the same apparent size in the sky, the consensus appears to be that this is just a coincidence but that strikes me as wildly unsatisfying. seems to me there ought to be an anthropic explanation and my schizo theory is that eclipses are somehow necessary for the creation of civilization, like they provide some kind of crucial stimulus to insight or creativity or something. here's sol riffing off of this
confusing that people interpreted this as a status hierarchy. part of my motivation for going into math was that every other field seemed too *hard*. math was the only field where i could make sense of everything in my head. always resonated with this von neumann quote: https://t.co/Er8AY11mVZ https://t.co/onBl9ac62A
was at this hippie event in boulder once, one of the top 5 most beautiful women i've ever met in my life told me she'd sped up the healing of a broken bone months faster than her doctors believed possible by meditating on it every day https://t.co/9c994OkhoC